Motherboard for amd athlon 64x2. Test results: performance improvement

Golovna / Nalashtuvannya

Nutrition about those, how to buy a motherboard for an Athlon 64, in the middle of the cost, it will cost more, regardless of the small capacity between them in principle. The main reason for this is the wrong approach to their choice, or rather, the transfer of the newcomer, which has grown when working with products for Socket A, to Socket 754/939. As a matter of fact, the difference between the old and new platforms is great, to be more precise - they simply cannot be compared.

Navit in particular models based on nForce2 and KT880 chipsets, we, in fact, are small on the right with five-year-old developments that have recognized the evolutionary changes. But the motherboards for the new AMD Athlon 64 processors were created, as they say, from scratch, so I won’t to this particular type don't go. Nourishment is only in what you understand the coristuvachi? Most potential buyers cannot afford to look at a working system with Athlon 64 through those that are practically not available at great stores. The very reason for the addition of a processor (mostly for Socket 754) and the transition to the mother's board will be more likely to happen. Navigate on the Internet for information on qiu topic zovsіm is not rich, and wear more swedish glances, lower test character.

In order to fill this clearing often, we have chosen all the models for Socket 754/939, which are in our market, and look at what Ukrainian buyers can choose at once, which is the mother of today and in which one can create an exclusive system.

Features of testing Boards were tested with the following configurations: Sempron 3100+, Athlon 64 3200+ (Socket 939) processors, Sapphire X800XT PE (AGP), X800 XL (PCI-E) video cards, GEIL PC4200 memory modules, WD hard drive

AT BIOS Setup All boards can be set to fixed AGP/PCI-E/PCI frequencies, the processor multiplier is reduced to the lowest value, after which the FSB frequency is raised after 5 MHz. After a skin change, the stability of the robot was checked - after the start of the OS (Windows XP Professional SP2) that was checked for pardons in the 7-Zip archiving test. The remaining "away" FSB frequency was entered to the table.

GEIL DDR-533 memory modules took part in the trials, as they are practically not sensitive to voltage changes (at 2.6 and 3.0 V, the characteristics may not change), but at the same time they have great potential at the reach of high frequencies. Also, if you take away the results of the truth, you can use the threshold ones.

Let's say a few more words about the practical silliness of fine tuning systems based on Athlon 64. The memory controller integration errors can be even low latency, the great impact on the swidcode is low timings. The real increase in productivity (for DDR400 mode) when switching from 8-4-4-3-CMD2 to 6-2-2-2-CMD1 for the Socket 754 platform becomes up to 15%, which is really a miraculous result (for matching: the same changing the parameters for the i875P on Socket 478 will add about 7%. But Socket 939 simply breaks all the records: the difference in dual-channel access on the new 90-nanometer Athlon 64 Winchester core can increase the speed by 20%. great FSB frequencies - rather think about getting good memory modules that work stably at low jamming values ​​(for example, such as Kingston HyperX or Corsair) - such a smart idea.

One more caution: when working with AMD64 platforms, the performance in the standard mode of 200 MHz with 6-2-2-2-CMD1 timings is higher, lower at 220 MHz with a reduced multiplier and 8-4-4-2-CMD2 timings. Also, to bring the lower threshold of overclocking, reachable by motherboards in our testing, you can make it as acceptable as possible. What is the most beautiful board, zdatna stably pratsyuvati at high frequencies? By the way, it should be noted about the correct wiring and the quality of the twisted elements, which, obviously, about the "correctness" of the BIOS Setup.

For those who are testing, on the basis of other similar materials, the range of brand representations is not so wide. Although mother boards for Athlon 64 today are in the arsenal of most manufacturers, not all of them are represented in our market in this segment. Prote 23 models from nine companies, we still got away with choosing, which by itself can already be called an indecent result.

Albatron K8X800 Pro II

Albatron K8X800 Pro II

As practice shows, the efficiency of robotics from the system board is rich in what can be insignificant, at first glance, nuances. The arrangement of different parts of the Albatron K8X800 ProII may have few peculiarities. So, close to the location of the microcircuit of the pivnichny bridge to the processor rose, the antrohi does not affect the settings of the processor cooler - the head-mounted mid-range radiator, which is on the chip, can reach a low height. Roztashuvannya roz'єmіv mem'yati allows you to direct the flow again, which cools її, near the upper part of the case, and even more importantly, the slots in the slots at the top of the screen should take into account the installation of the video card - in reality, it's a little underproduction.

The upper half of the K8X800 ProII is heavily packed with contact pads: between the roses of memory and the edge of the board there is an IDE port and the main ATX connector, so as not to damage the system by hand folding on this platform. And moving the FDD-interface to the very bottom of the case, maybe, can symbolize the residual capacity of the retailer in the form of a 3.5-inch storage device.

AOpen n250a-FR

AOpen n250a-FR

The layout of this modern ATX-pay is cheaply unconventional, which can be seen more up to positive moments. Three roses of DIMM are sold to the beast, above the processor socket; right-handed vіd ny - lively, roses PATA and FDD. The single chip for the NVidia nForce3 250 chipset is right-handed for PCI and AGP slots. There are only two SATA roses, placed directly under the processor socket. And on this board, there is a SATA RAID controller, and in order of every single group, more SATA ports were added.

The placement of the components should be thought out - so, after checking the flow of the processor cooler "expensive", before hitting the radiator, blowing the video card, and after that - more memory. In addition, the flows of the processor cooler and the "drawing" of the cooling block, which, without a doubt, are suitable for maintaining the optimal temperature regime in the middle of the case.

The board is supported by wonderful equipment ("suspended" BIOS, two FireWire ports, S/PDIF digital inputs/outputs, such a port as a joystick port) and a great number of technical innovations.

ASUS A8AE-LA

ASUS A8AE-LA

Before us, having spent the engineering education of the motherboard on the new ATI Xpress 200 chipset. While the product is being expanded under the ASUS trademark and may have a name, the official wine is still not available (on the website of the collection of information about this model, it is not known far away). Regardless of the mATX form factor, the A8AE-LA can be safely placed in the category of top products. Integrated graphic core, slot for external PCI Express x16 video card, FireWire controller and some SATA ports (via ATI SB400 direct port) with the ability to create RAID arrays. It also supports PCI Riser, which rarely expands the scope for installation of "yalinka" and allows you to install a board in 1U cases with a PCI-card, slotted parallel to the board surface. I'll add a big picture of the 24-pin socket of life, which once again denounces the possibility of a server blocking of this product. The Xpress 200 chipset of ATI is more solid. For example, Canadians simply don't have any competitors for the functionality of a built-in video - there's no way to get up to the capabilities of an integrated Radeon 9600. Also, marveling at the serial symbols on the new set of logics will be sublime.

ASUS K8S-MX

ASUS K8S-MX

One of the smallest boards to look around at the necessary attributes of an office platform. On the minimum area, it is placed on a pair of PCI-slots, memory sockets, SATA and IDE. Perhaps, through marriage, the designers had a chance to open the IDE connector by 90 °, and the FDD port to blame down the board, under the PCI slot. A high heatsink on the pivnіchny bridge, close to the expansion to the processor socket, it can stand on the front if non-standard coolers are installed. And yet, the nuances of the layout are unlikely to be important, even if the platform is given a position for the serial storage of office "robot horses", and not for enthusiasts, as they are constantly engaged in modernizing and overclocking their PCs.

From the receiving features of the payment, I would like to indicate the presence of the PCI-E x1 rose, as well as the branded color marking of the control connector and the indication of the front panel, to evaluate the choices.

ASUS K8V Deluxe/K8V SE Deluxe

ASUS K8V SE Deluxe

Retailing between two products from ASUS is rather tricky. Even though the board with the SE index is an additional release of the original Deluxe, but it is not an updated version of the new bridge and the Gigabit Ethernet controller.

The layout of the elements is a reminder of the thoughtfulness of ASUS design engineers. It is possible to get close to the close roztashuvannya of the radiator of the pivnіchny bridge to the fastening of the processor cooler. The situation is even better, if some designs cannot be fixed on the standard socket above the processor. Possibly, solve the problem by adding an additional reinforcement of the radiator of the pivnichny bridge.

The topology of life, memory, and AGP slots does not indicate power. Placement of planks of memory with a spray of air blown by a stream of wind. As always, at the height it is equipped with additional roses on the back panel system unit: you can connect two USB ports, COM port and game port.

ASUS K8V-X

ASUS K8V-X

The model is clearly protected for economical lovers of the brand, yak, vtim, lie down to their systems without special claims. Pay series X traditionally with budget solutions with a kind of "gift" like ASUS - you can see S / PDIF on the rear panel, a Gigabit Ethernet controller or an audio codec like Analog Devices. It's not surprising, on K8V-X everything is more detailed, what to rob її to get more lucrative (especially the insurance price). Dodatkova komplektatsiya practical vіdsutnya, but it's unlikely to become serious at the factory, everything you need is already on the PCB and the rear panel. The undoubted plus is that you pay for the strained BIOS Setup and the visually different displays. It seems that ASUS engineers have been saying that all models without a blame, that they are trademarked, due to their mother's great overclocking potential, and the K8V-X is a good stock.

ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

ASUS K8N-E Deluxe

A modern ATX board based on the widest chipset for Socket 754 is NVidia nForce 3. If you have enough free space on textolite, the placement of components could be good. An unexpected solution - the SATA ports were patched between the processor socket and the AGP slot. Wanting to be unruly tse viklikati is not guilty, but a bit too late landing of two IDE ports and roses of life is melodiously worthy of not being rich. For those who are not enough for two SATA ports, there is a Silicon Image controller with a SATA 150 and the possibility of creating "serious" RAID arrays (up to 0 + 1). The rear panel is balanced and functional, so it is unlikely that you need to add additional pads. In terms of overclocking, K8N-E Deluxe is among the champions - the FSB frequency of 250 MHz is just a miraculous result.

ESC K8T800-A

ECS K8T800-A

Violet textolіt tsієї pay ryasnіє unoccupied positions. With sufficient PCB area, this model can be called standard. Vaughn is not overwhelmed by roses, which allowed the designers to spread them freely, without particular tightness. Mutual expansion of the processor socket, the VRM block and the memory slots ensure airflow for the remaining two, and even though for the VRM elements it can be cooled, then for the memory modules - warm, heated. If the processor shows up too hot, then it is better to install the memory in the far slot. Although, judging by the stickers on the box and on the board itself, the most "important" processor is AMD Sempron, which is not the most popular 64-bit extension and works at equally low frequencies. The support of the entire AMD K8 family without borders is declared to this supporter.

Foxconn 755A01-6EKRS

Foxconn 755AO1-6EKRS

It is well equipped and has a large area board for Foxconn. Tse to bring to the fact that it is not easy to get to all the connectors. So, IDE-and FDD-spoiled, and also the ATX-life bar is squeezed in one to one. At the same time, two pairs of SATA roses are soldered freely and in that area, pay, access to which is not blocked by the enclosures of disk storage devices. Large capacitor banks in close proximity to the processor socket and memory slots may be a sign of the overworld reinsurance of retailers. But first of all - about those who, with their help, the designers smoothed out the "shortness" of the tires. Simplify the ability of BIOS Setup and 36-month warranty to confirm that the product is suitable for the corporate market.

Gigabyte GA-K8NS Ultra 939, GA K8NSNXP-939

An example of pay, which having spent on testing, can be more called a technical skill, a lower finished product (yogo appearance is just around the corner). Interestingly, there is still no revision of the VT8237R bridge, and we have not been able to figure out what the letter R means. Outrageous – an inexpensive self-sustaining option for young Athlon 64 processors. The surprisingly modest (behind the world of Gigabyte products) rear panel with two COM ports. Plugging in the 24-pin power socket, similarly, is becoming traditional for another generation of Socket 939 with PCI Express support - this board is equipped with a plug that closes the additional contacts at a different power block to the old standard. Call the VRM module for this trademark attached to the promotion of respect - "at an eye" the number of coils on coils is the most matched with the products of competitors. How to appear on the operational characteristics, show the testing of serial samples.

MSI K8M Neo-V

MSI K8M Neo-V

This model is based on the VIA K8M800 chipset. The width of the board has been changed to make it necessary to place its own placement of other components - there are only two DIMM roses (which, by the way, sound quite enough), but there is a serious lack of handiness - when the Secondary IDE cables are installed, close the pop-up on the AGP rose moreover, there was not far away a condenser in this region.

However, it's not a fact that AGP will be installed in the system on the K8M Neo V. There will be requests for its own equipment, a standard office board equipped with an integrated graphics accelerator, as it should be for this class of add-ons. Nothing else is seen in the cohort of "office practitioners" - two SATA roses, AC'97 codec and Fast Ethernet controller from Realtek, hardware monitoring from Winbond.

MSI K8N Neo-FSR, K8N Neo Platinum

MSI K8N Neo-FSR
MSI K8N Neo Platinum

The difference between the two models is more important in their configurations - they have the same PCB (and, according to the models of competitors, covered with a dark matte varnish). The larger Platinum Edition board has more equipment, an additional FireWire controller via VIA and two more SATA ports - for installing the controller via Marvell. Everything else is identical, although on the board there is even less one unsoldered landing place for the great chip - more for everything, there is an additional Ethernet controller (the main one is GbE from Marvell).

Payments based on the NVidia nForce 3 250Gb chipset are subject to other minor changes in the processor socket. Three DIMM slots are placed above it, and the right-handed one is a life connector and IDE sockets. The reason for such a design was to expand the space between AGP and the processor socket and optimize the redundant flows in the middle of the case. Other features of the varto indicate the presence of a new (5.1-channel) audio output pad on the board, including optical digital output.

In the meantime, one more note of the Platinum-version was revealed for more respectful documentation. A brochure is added to the model under the name Test Report, de refurbishment of components, with any amount of payment rechecked already at the factory. It’s hard to say, why is there a practical sense in it - it’s even obvious that the test is not to be tested with a leather copy of the pay, but a series of scorched ones, but to finish the cicava itself.

MSI K8T Neo 2

MSI K8T Neo 2

This is one of the first boards that we brought to our laboratory just after the announcement of the new AMD processor socket. Marveling at the її vіdmіnostі in the layout and bred in the new models, you can stverdzhuvat that K8T Neo 2 - a representative of the next generation. As a minimum, black textolite and the soldering method "match" with the products that MSI produced in 2003. Prote such a controversy did not negatively signify on the demonstration of the results, rather on the contrary. Possibility to pay with low timings and to show a record swidcode allowed us to set records on our hour.

The VRM module is even worse - the elements of the tri-channel switcher are properly ripped, and the transistors are protected from overheating by hard heatsinks. The rear panel deserves even more praise: six audio cues, optical and coaxial S/PDIF, two FireWire sockets (one of them in the mini-Viconan) – all this allows you to talk about the K8T Neo 2 as a serious multimedia product. Without a doubt, pay the iniquitous future, especially since the price will become peaceful in an hour.

PC Chips K8 M860

PC Chips M860

This board based on the K8T800 chipset has a small width, which, however, did not show up on the layout of the components. True, the radiator of the pivnіchny bridge is close to the processor rose, but there are problems with the installations on it full-time We don't have a viniclo cooler. The complete set of pay, like any budget solution, is minimal - it’s less than the most expensive, the most expensive, additional supplementary strips that expand the communication possibilities of the payment, it’s not. From the "archaisms" it is significant CNR-roses, which in the rest of the hour daedals trap closer.

Everything else: five PCI slots, one AGP, two SATA ports, integrated CMI9761A audio, VIA VT6103L Fast Ethernet controller. Therefore, we may have a standard platform for an office PC, but the graphical one will be transferred to the old one.

Soltek SL-K8AN2-GR

Soltek SL-K8AN2-GR

This model is seen in the middle of the light purple color of all plastic components and its non-primary layout, which is more suggestive of the rose coloring on boards to the BTX standard. In every case, the memory slots are placed over the processor socket, which rotates 90° according to the stellar orientation. The microcircuit of the single-chip logic set is passively cooled behind an additional aluminum radiator and is right-handed in the PCI slots, so you cannot set the CPU cooler settings. Then, the capacitors to the VRM block are pushed up to the bottom and allow only the central "chip" to be beaten. Pay attention to this aspect of the varto when choosing non-reference coolers.

The peculiarity of the rear panel with roses: there are two consecutive damages on it, although the presence of one COM has become the standard for most models of all varieties.

Soltek SL-K8AV2-RL

Soltek SL-K8AV2-RL

Behind the grand scheme of things, this board is an analogue of the front model, with the same difference, which replaces the NVidia chipset, the VIA K8T800 wins here. The remains of the rest are made up of two microcircuits, the scheme for distributing the payment of the troch has changed, wanting to remember to do it importantly. On the minus side, the functionality of the rear panel is significantly weak - a set of two COM-ports and LPT is rather old, and the axis for sound roses in the space clearly showed up a little - only three main sockets were left out. It's a waste of time to download the Yakish codec VIA Vinyl, which rarely fails, such a scheme looks really marvelous.

Soltek SL-K890Pro-939

Soltek SL-K890Pro-939

Yaskravy is a representative of the third generation of VIA chipsets with the PCI Express SL-K890Pro-939 support, clearly oriented towards serious home congestion. For the first time the retailers did not care about the details, they equipped the board "for the rest of the fashion." Two SATA ports that go up to the VT8237 pvden bridge, are connected to one more SATA pair like the Promise PDC20579 RAID controller. Zavdyaki youmu є one more IDE port, so virishuvat problem, where to connect hard disks and optical drive, just do not get it. This board has all the attributes of an overclocker product - here is the POST-code indicator push blocks VRM for processors and memory modules. Possibility of BIOS Setup also won't disappoint enthusiasts. Perhaps, turn this product of clicks for good if it is in our country company. It's even possible that the SL-K890Pro-939 board is worth it.

Soltek SL-K8TPro-939

Soltek SL-K8TPro-939

This board is on the front of the SL-K890Pro-939, but in fact, the similarity is surrounded by an exclusive look. For its feasibility, it also comes up with novelties on the VIA chipset. The pieces of SL-K8TPro-939 appeared a long time ago, so you can see how to try it out while drinking it and try it on its interaction with Athlon 64 processors. The possibility of changing the voltage and the indicator of POST-codes, unfortunately, can not be accepted good results at the dispersal.

The first and so far the only board based on the new NVidia chipset, which has been taken to the Test Lab before us, was the ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe in the most possible configuration. The product really looks good: black textolite, two PCI Express x16 graphics ports, two SATA ports, VRM cooling radiators and chipset – everything I think is the prestige car Porsche Cayenne Turbo (it’s hard to say why, though, it’s not the fault of other associations). The additional Molex rose and the other hard VRM elements are not for painting. The fee is responsible for the security of living as a minimum of three large "non-aggressive" outbuildings - a processor and two video cards.

The greatest interest is the placement of two graphic roses between the key-switch. A small expansion of the pay, failing in the SO-DIMM format, simply remiking the expansion of links to two or one PCI Express port. Understandably, it was possible to block the microcircuit with a double jumper, but the A8N-SLI Deluxe looked less effective. A noteworthy feature is the new 24-pin rosette of life, so in this plan, the Intel platform will be released every day.

The results of the test made a little noise for us, so we dedicate nForce4 and SLI technology to the article, more importantly, the chipset itself, and the nuances of installing two video cards became the #1 topic among computer enthusiasts.

Delivery of bags

Carried out close to that time, the testing of motherboards for Socket A () revealed a number of shortcomings, which were not included in the remaining revisions of the nForce2 Ultra 400 chipset. zastosuvannya. Just for the record: on the test of one board on the Intel 865PE chipset, on average, about 40 minutes were spent, while for nForce2 it often takes more than a second year.

Now we can happily tell you: the Socket 754/939 platforms have a lot of problems, which were reviewed in the previous implementations of chipsets AMD processors, far away pozutisya. Practically all payments worked normally, navit without regard for those that, in fact, were non-serial ones, and more than half were less than the first versions of the BIOS. So, we are leading the way - I think, with the right marketing, we will soon have systems in our offices chosen by business companies based on Athlon 64.

The diagrams clearly show that bus frequencies of 240/250 MHz are the threshold values ​​for boards based on VIA K8T800 and NVidia nForce3 250 Gb chipsets. All protested models for Socket 754 will become a distant choice, but the most respected meritorious model Albatron K8X800 Pro II. Equipping pay for all the praise: high sound capabilities, full sound card VIA ENVY 24 PT (24 bit/96 kHz) with a full set of plugs, including digital input and output, plus the presence of FireWire to play just a multimedia combine. And if you guess about the overclocking quirks of BIOS Setup, as well as the low variability, it's obvious that competitors simply don't get a chance. The fee deservedly otrimu signs "Editor's Choice: Best Buy" that .

In the midst of products for Socket 939, I will see a better purchase ahead of time, since this platform is still far from the mass market. Well, the sign "Editor's choice: the best quality"(you can say, the pose of the competition) took the fee ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe. The results demonstrated by this model turned out to be simply phenomenal (the FSB value of 320 MHz for AMD processors seems to be quite naming), and that's why the language varto shows more detailed functionality of the chipset itself. In the meantime, the absolute champion of Socket 939 for all parameters - productivity, overclocking capabilities, equipment, and, arguably, prices.

The latest era can become the beginning of the era of 64-bit AMD platforms. In principle, those same people said that at the beginning of 2004, but there were no more reasons for that. Dosi Socket 754/939 stands in for Socket A. We are to blame for this, the processor manufacturing company itself, which continues the marvelous rank of continuing the life of long-old platforms. Prospects for Socket 939 are the most popular, brand new 90-nm processors based on Winchester core appeared on the Ukrainian market, moreover, in sufficient quantity. Chi zberezhetsya such a situation and nadaly, until nevidomo, so bazhayuschim mother of the most advanced AMD platform should be upgraded.

The motherboard (motherboard) is the main board in a personal computer, so the foundation for a PC is called, so before choosing a warto, it’s even more serious. Itself in the mother's payment to lay productivity, stability and scalability, so a further upgrade of your computer, the possibility of installing a harder processor, more memory, and so on.

Twenty years before the century dictates the mind - mind the commodity prosperity, the hour of the shortage has passed irrevocably. Today, practically any computer store can offer a great selection of products, including a great assortment of motherboards. It’s easy for the peresichny spozhivachev to grow up in this majestic prosperity, and the marketing programs and advertising went out to bring even more swindle. As you know, marketing is the engine of progress, and don't forget that what is "good" for an advertising booklet, "good" for your PC. It is very important to choose the right choice. Hopefully, our material will become a competent recommendation when choosing a motherboard.

In order to learn about the nutritional choice of the mother's payment, it is necessary for the mother to have basic knowledge. To that, first of all, go to the heart of the matter and try to apply it, we tried to spend a small amount of time on motherboards.

Motherboard

Otzhe, we have already voiced more, the motherboard is the main board of the current PC. In the basis of whether a mother's payment is to lie in such a way as a set of logics (or a chipset, to whom it suits). The chipset is the basic set of microcircuits that determines the feasibility and architecture of the motherboard. Speaking in simple terms, the chipset itself determines which processor can be installed on the motherboard, which type and type operational memory You will trim the motherboard just fine.

The chipset is made up of two microcircuits, which are called pivdennym and pivnichnym bridges. Pivnіchny place for its day-to-day bridge, what happens, and controls the flow of these tires. All the main computer buses are connected to the new one: processor, RAM bus, graphics bus, connection bus with a pivdenniy bridge. Pivdenniy mist vіdpovіdaє for peripherіynі pristroї and raznі zvnіshnі tyres. So, before the new connection: expansion slots, USB ports, IDE controller, additional IDE, SATA or FireWire controllers. Double-chip architecture - classical, not included and single-chip solution. Most modern sets of logic are single-chip solutions, pro architecture, at a glance of technology, do not change. At times, one chip is worn by one’s own ability and pivdenny, and pivnichny bridges, yak, with one’s own blackness, tied among oneself.

A modern set of logic can easily call for all the necessary capabilities: a robot with modern processors, a decent amount of RAM, a lot of IDE channels, a robot with Serial ATA hard disks, 8-10 USB ports for connecting calling peripherals. Deyakі chipsets can boast of such a possibility, like a creation of a RAID array.

Okremo wants to use the integration of logic sets - chipsets from the built-in graphics core. As a rule, budgetary motherboards are designed on such chipsets, as they allow you to save money for the cost of a built-in video card. However, in such a system, there are no miracles for graphic productivity. These solutions are more for office work, but not for computer games and rozvag. As it seems, there are no miracles - you have to pay for everything.

As we have already designated more, the main capabilities of the motherboard are determined by a set of logic, most often the motherboards' hacks are based on the controllers and codecs of third-party vendors - this is especially good for the segment of expensive Hi-End products. Such a pidkhid allows you to expand the functionality of the mother board. So, a lot of chipsets cannot support IEEE 1394, which will be more similar to a modern high-performance PC, so the companies-companies install a FireWire-controller. It's even better that a mother's payment maker can produce products for a different market segment - with such a rank of wines, you can be satisfied with the drink of the most troubled client. Zreshtoy vigramo mi - just keep calm. You need a motherboard with basic capabilities - you have the ability to buy an inexpensive motherboard from a good brand, in which of your child controllers there will be a measure of that sound controllers for daily cherry). Navischo overpay for zayvі mozhlivostі, yakami vіnіkoli not koristuvatemeet. Thank you, for whom you need a gigabit storage system and additional SATA- and IDE RAID controllers, choose more expensive and, obviously, a functional motherboard - good, such a possibility.

Modern additional codecs that are installed in motherboards, whether it is a SATA RAID controller or an additional network, you can do it garna yakist that vіdminnі mozhlivostі. Vignatok to become a sound controller, which is the AC '97 codec for most speakers. Most of all, the quality of the sound path, prote, suffers from a new one, so you do not present serious symptoms to the sound and you do not transmit professional activity at whom directly, whose solution is too much to stick. Deyakі vyrobniki vіdmovilis vіd vikoristannya AC97-kodekіv, zastosovuchi replacing them with discrete top solutions of the past years. As a butt, you can point the MSI K 8 N Diamond motherboard, on which the Creative Sound Blaster Live 24-bit discrete chip is used. Obviously, Sound Blaster Live 24-bit is not between the world, and yet the chip is much better, lower be-like AC97-solution. Varto signify that such decisions are made, as a rule, on top-end expensive motherboards.

At this time, mothers pay to the ATX standard (it is necessary to choose the most standard, because AT is already morally obsolete) is available in two formats: ATX and Mini ATX. The form factor imposes an exchange on the expansion of the motherboard and, depending on the number of slots, distribution on the motherboard. A current motherboard in ATX format can have approximately the following number of slots: 2-4 slots for installing memory modules, one slot for the AGP graphic bus or PCI Express for installing a video card, 5-6 slots for the PCI bus or 2-3 slots for the PCI bus and 2- 4 PCI Express bus slots for installing add-on expansion cards (modem, TV tuner, media card). Choosing between ATX and Mini ATX is to be based on your wimogs before PC. Do you know if you have any additional attachments and vicorists? Modem, mesh card, sound card, TV tuner? On the basis of these data, it will not matter to choose a choice. If your PC does not transfer any additional expansion boards, you can safely take the motherboard to the Mini ATX format, saving a lot of money. I think it’s worth explaining why the Mini ATX board is cheaper than the lower sized ATX board, it’s not a big deal - everything is clear here.

It's not a secret for anyone that hardware without a software warehouse is a hallway chain. The motherboard is not a culprit, the software warehouse, whether it's a motherboard or a basic BIOS input-output system.

For additional BIOS, you have the ability to adjust various parameters of your system, for example, the firmware of the memory subsystem, turn on and turn on the various additional controllers and in. We will not dwell on these topics in detail, for that which will require a great material.

As you can see, everything in our world is not ideal, and to learn more and more motherboard manufacturers are smart enough to pardon their products, you can go further than updating the BIOS for those other motherboards.

Choice of mother's payment

All of the above and є nebhіdnі basic knowledge, yakі nіbіbnі in order, schob hoch trohi to delve into the nutritional choice of the mother's payment.

In the theoretical part of the material, we pass without intermediary choice of the motherboard.

To sound the choice, it is necessary to choose the processor.

AMD platform

On this day at the market information technologies Various companies showcase the great range of AMD processors. Today, AMD is taking a leading position in the microprocessor market in Russia. We do not care about the corporate market, discussing the home market exclusively - here AMD feels like a fish in the water. Starting with the appearance of 64-bit Athlon 64 processors in 2003, AMD decided to take the label "forever attacking its main competitor - Intel". For a long time, Intel could not propagate a processor with a similar architecture and price: most of the time, the central processor Athlon 64 was the cheapest and most productive in the same addenda (for example, in computer games) of its competitor in the Pentium 4, buy a PC at home, give / give credit to AMD products themselves.

The peculiarity of AMD 64 architecture, which is featured in Athlon 64 processors and new Sempron (64-bit) processors, makes it possible to work with both 64-bit programs and 32-bit programs - without wasting the firmware and pratsezdatnost. Why, Athlon 64 processors can use such a cool technology, like Cool "n" Quiet, as it allows you to lower the clock frequency and, apparently, the voltage on the processor in the fall due to the rise of the tasks at the given moment. The craziness of Cool "n" Quiet is obvious - typing text in Word does not have such a great amount of computational tightness, as you can propagate the Athlon 64 processor, the reduction in clock frequency and voltage is pleasantly indicated on the thermal imaging processor.

At the moment, the Athlon 64 processors that are on sale are based on decal cores: ClawHammer, SledgeHammer, NewCastle, Winchester, Venice and San Diego.

The Athlon 64 processor on the ClawHammer core is morally obsolete, so I won’t buy it to look at it. The NewCastle core supports processors for both Socket 754 and Socket 939. The socket imposes a number of powers: for example, Athlon 64 processors on the NewCastle core for Socket 939 may have a dual-channel DDR memory controller, which is better for Socket 7. Of course, these processors have a different Hyper-Transport bus frequency: for the Socket 939 version, it should be 1 GHz, and Socket 754 - 800 MHz.

NewCastle core processors oscillate in 0.13 micron technology. The clock frequency of these Athlon 64 processors is not higher than 2.2 to 2.4 GHz. The NewCastle kernel transfers a 512 KB cache of another equal.

The SledgeHammer core wins out in the so-called Hi-End processors - Athlon FX and Athlon 64 with a 4000+ rating. Processors may have a dual-channel memory controller and 1 MB of cache memory of another level. SledgeHammer's vibration technology is 0.13 microns, and the Hyper-Transport bus can be clocked at 1 GHz. The processors operate at clock frequencies from 22 to 26 GHz.

Athlon 64 processors, based on Winchester, Venice and San Diego cores, are available exclusively for Socket 939, which means that the dual-channel memory controller and the Hyper-Transport bus frequency of 1 GHz can stink.

The Winchester core is powered by 0.13-micron technology and can have 512 kB L2 cache in its own order. The clock speeds of AMD Athlon 64 based on the Winchester core range from 1.8 to 2.2 GHz.

The Athlon 64 central processors on the Venice core are rich in what they repeat on the Winchester core - the same Socket 939, dual-channel DDR memory controller, Hyper-Transport bus frequency 1 GHz, cache memory of another equal with a volume of 512 KB. Prote є th row of features: for example, processors on the Venice core are used for additional technology of the so-called "stretched" silicon - Dual Stress Liner (DSL), which allows you to increase the speed of the transistorization of the transistors by a quarter. In addition, processors on the Venice core support typing SSE3 instructions. It can be said that Athlon 64 processors, based on the Venice core, with the first AMD chips, support the SSE3 instruction set. It also means that in the core of Venice, the problem of the robotic memory controller, which was present at Winchester, was eliminated. So, for an hour filling all the DIMM slots of the motherboard with DDR400 memory modules, the memory controller is working like DDR333. Fortunately, in the past, Athlon 64 (Venice) works without problems with a large number of memory modules. The rating of Athlon 64 processors on the Venice core becomes 3000+, 3200+, 3500+ and 3800+, and, apparently, the frequencies fluctuate from 1.8 to 2.4 GHz.

The San Diego core is the latest and most advanced for single-core AMD Athlon 64 processors. In general, the same Venice: dual-channel memory controller, Hyper-Transport 1 GHz, SSE3 instruction set, Athlon 64 processor on the San Diego core starts with a rating 4000 + (Real clock frequency - 2.4 GHz) and may have more cache memory (1 MB) of another equal, lower processor, based on the Venice core.

Besides Athlon 64 processors stand dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors.

The Athlon 64 X2 family includes a few models rated 4200+, 4400+, 4600+ and 4800+.

These processors are approved for installation in a dedicated Socket 939 motherboard - smut, shob motherboard BIOS pay pіdtrimuvav qі processors. Dual-core Athlon 64 X2 processors are the same as all single-core Athlon 64 twins, with a dual-channel memory controller, a HyperTransport bus with a frequency of up to 1 GHz, and support for the SSE3 instruction set.

AMD Athlon 64 X2 processors are based on cores codenamed Toledo and Manchester. Vіdminnіst mіzh processors polagaє obsyaza cache-memory. So, on the core with the Toledo code name, there will be processors with ratings of 4800+ and 4400+, and there will be two L2 caches (on the skin of the cores) with a volume of 1 MB of skins. Set these clock speeds to 2400 MHz for Athlon 64 X2 4800+ and 2200 MHz for Athlon 64 X2 4400+.

The AMD Athlon 64 X2 processors are positioned by AMD as the solution to digital content. for coristuvachіv, as important is the richness of the flow - the possibility of winning a dekіlkoh resourceful addenda at once.

We looked more closely at the Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 X2 processors, which are recognized for the Mainstream, Gaming and Prosumer & Digital Media segments, but forget about such a large-scale and budget segment, as Value is the most popular and demanded on the Russian high-tech market.

AMD's Value segment is represented by budget Sempron processors.

Today, our market can support AMD Sempron processors based on two cores - Paris and Palermo.

Processors based on the Paris core are morally obsolete, they are released for a 0.13-micron technological process and are clocked exclusively at the Viconan Socket 754. These processors can have a single-channel memory controller and a HyperTransport bus with a frequency of up to 800 MHz. The main feature of the budget processor Sempron (Paris) is similar to the older brother Athlon 64 and the support of AMD64 technology, so, regardless of the K8 architecture, Sempron on the Paris core is a 32 bit processor. Before that, the cache memory of another processor Sempron (Paris) was changed to 256 kB for the equivalent 512 and 1024 kB for Athlon 64 family processors.

The core of Palermo at the district of Paris has recognized a number of changes. Thus, Sempron processors based on the Palermo core are manufactured using the 90-nm process technology.

This core is released for a long time and may have a number of revisions - D and E. Revision D is morally obsolete, so I don’t care about such processors, but you can be surprised to a larger current and fresh revision E. Sempron processors on the Palermo rev. E, like the Athlon 64 (Venice) processors, they use additional technology of the so-called "stretched" silicon - Dual Stress Liner (DSL), which allows you to increase the flexibility of the transistors in a quarter. Like the older brother Athlon 64 (Venice), processors on the core Palermo rev. E support a set of SSE3 instructions. Varto designate the budget line of Sempron processors based on the Palermo Rev. Part of the L2 cache has been spared, support for 64-bit extensions and Cool'n'Quiet technology. However, Sempron (Palermo rev. E), like the older brother of Athlon 64, may be NX-bit. To call Cool'n'Quiet's expense wrong is more inhumane. Undoubtedly, the cost for an overclocker: the cost of C "n" C - the impossibility of lowering the multiplier, obviously, and the expansion of the processor, it needs to be done differently, and the same system board.

Sempron processors for the 939 socket have been reported by AMD for a long time, until recently they were unavailable. On the right, in that the Semprons for Socket 939 vibrate in relatively small quantities, the great PC vibrators buy them. At the moment, only one Sempron processor model with a 3000+ rating is available in Moscow stores.

The line of AMD Sempron processors for Socket 939 is large and includes processors with a rating of 3000+ to 3400+ and another equal cache memory of 128 and 256 kb.

AMD Sempron processors for Socket 939 can boast of a new set of technologies that power their older brothers in the Athlon 64 line: support for the SSE3 instruction set, NX-bit and Cool "n" Quiet technologies, as well as support for the 64-bit AMD64 extension.

Sets of system logic

Motherboards for Athlon 64 and Sempron processors are manufactured based on a number of logic sets such as NVIDIA, VIA, ATI, SiS and Uli.

Let's look at NVIDIA chipsets. Today, 3rd and 4th generation nForce chipsets are on the motherboard market.

nForce 3 logic set for single-chip solutions and few modifications: 150, 150 Pro, 250, 250 Pro and Ultra. May be amazed at 250 Gb and Ultra-versions, because Rashta is already morally obsolete, and it will be important for you to learn about the sale, even though it is not included. Also, NVIDIA nForce 3 Ultra. Tsej nabіr logic, on vіdmіnu vіd vіd vіd vіd sіvіh brethren, pіdtrimuі bus HyperTransportіz frequency 1 GHz. Motherboards for nForce 3 Ultra are on sale for both Socket 754 and Socket 939.

Motherboards, which are based on the nForce 3 Ultra chipset, can boast of a gigabyte storage controller, eight USB 2.0 ports, two Serial ATA channels and the ability to create RAID arrays. In the yakost graphic interface AGP 8x is victorious. Like Bachimo, regardless of the age, the possibilities of nForce 3 Ultra are up-to-date and today. Paying extra prices for motherboards that are based on nForce 3 Ultra, such a solution will become an indestructible choice. Before NVIDIA nForce 3 Ultra, it's not a good idea to be surprised if you want to choose an inexpensive personal computer based on Sempron processors and the young Athlon 64.

Entry

We are beginning to be familiar with dual-core processors for desktop computers. When you look around, you will know everything about the processor with two cores from AMD: general information, performance testing, research and information about energy saving and thermal imaging.

The time for dual-core processors has arrived. In the next hour, processors equipped with two counting cores will start actively penetrating the desktop computers. Until the end of advancing fate, most new PCs can be based on a CPU with two cores.
The layers of the most efficient way to increase productivity due to the production of dual-core architectures are explained only by those, other methods of increasing productivity have already been exhausted. Increasing the clock frequencies is very important, but increasing the speed of the bus and expanding the cache memory does not lead to a good result.
At the same hour, the 90-nm technological revolution has reached its full height and there are no points, if the production of giant crystals with an area of ​​​​close to 200 square meters. mm became profitable. The very fact gave the opportunity to CPU builders to launch a campaign for the promotion of dual-core architectures.

Also today, May 9, 2005, for Intel, we present our dual-core processors for desktop systems and AMD. While we're on the verge of dual-core Smithfield processors (Intel Pentium D and Intel Extreme Edition), about the beginning of deliveries is not yet available, the stink will be a little later. At this moment, AMD gives us the opportunity to get to know ahead of time with its promising propositions.
AMD's line of dual-core processors has given the name Athlon 64 X2. The name reflects the fact that the new dual-core CPUs are capable of the AMD64 architecture, as well as those that have two number of cores in them. At once, I’ll name the processors with two cores for floor systems and take away the power logo:


The Athlon 64 X2 family at the time of the yogo appeared on the shelves of stores, including processors with ratings of 4200+, 4400+, 4600+ and 4800+. Chi processors can be purchased for a price of $500 to $1000 in fallow due to their productivity. Tobto, their line of Athlon 64 X2 AMD put it behind the better Athlon 64.
However, first of all, let's begin to judge the performance of the new CPUs, let's take a closer look at the features of these processors.

Athlon 64 X2 architecture

It should be noted that the implementation of dual-core in AMD processors is somewhat different from the implementation of Intel. Although, like Pentium D and Pentium Extreme Edition, Athlon 64 X2, in essence, two Athlon 64 processors, combined on one chip, a dual-core processor from AMD suggests another way to interoperate cores with each other.
On the right, the fact that Intel's pidhid is based on a simple placement of two Prescott cores on one die. For such an organization of dual core, the processor does not have any special mechanisms for implementing the interaction between the cores. Therefore, like in typical Xeon-based dual-processor systems, the cores in Smithfield are coupled (for example, to solve problems with cache coherence) behind an auxiliary system bus. Obviously, the system bus is divided between the processor cores and for an hour of work with memory, which will lead to an increase in zatrimok while reducing to memory both cores at once.
AMD engineers made it possible to create rich-core processors at the stage of development of the AMD64 architecture. Zavdyaki tsomu, the dual-core Athlon 64 X2 deyakі vuzki mіstsya far away. First, the duplication of new AMD processors is far from all resources. If you want the skin of the cores of the Athlon 64 X2, you can set up more advanced devices and see the cache memory of a different level, the memory controller and the controller of the Hyper-Transport bus to cover the hot cores. The interaction of the dermal nuclei with resources is supported by a special Crossbar jumper and system requests (System Request Queue). On this level, it is organized and the interaction of the cores among themselves, which is why the coherence power of the caches depends on the system bus and the memory bus.


Thus, in one place, in the architecture of Athlon 64 X2 - the throughput of the memory subsystem is 6.4 GB per second, as it is shared between processor cores. In the meantime, AMD is planning to switch to more Swiss types of memory, zocrema, dual-channel DDR2-667 SDRAM. This krok can be positively recognized for the increased productivity of dual-core CPUs themselves.
The importance of keeping up with today's memory types due to the high throughput capacity of the new dual-core processors is explained by the fact that AMD has forewarned to save the Athlon 64 X2's complexity with platforms. As a result, these processors can be used in the same motherboards as the original Athlon 64. Therefore, the Athlon 64 X2 can be equipped with a Socket 939 package, a dual-channel memory controller with DDR400 SDRAM support and can be used with a HyperTransport bus with a frequency of up to 1 GHz The only thing that is necessary for supporting dual-core CPUs like AMD with current Socket 939 motherboards is the price of BIOS upgrades. At the link with the cim, it should be noted that, fortunately, AMD engineers were able to fit into the previously installed frame that power supply of Athlon 64 X2.

In this way, in a part of the system with the same infrastructure, dual-core processors from AMD appeared to be better than competing Intel products. Smithfield is even better with the new i955X and NVIDIA nFroce4 (Intel Edition) chipsets, as well as an upgrade to the motherboard power converter.
Athlon 64 X2 processors are based on cores codenamed Toledo and Manchester step E, so for their functionality (because of the ability to process two counting streams in one hour) the new CPUs are similar to Athlon 64 based on San Diego and Venice cores. So, Athlon 64 X2 supports typing SSE3 instructions, as well as the memory controller. Among the features of the Athlon 64 X2 memory controller is the ability to use different DIMM modules in different channels (even before inserting memory modules of different sizes into memory channels) and the ability to work with two-sided DIMM modules in DDR400 mode.
The Athlon 64 X2 (Toledo) processor, which covers two cores with a cache memory of another 1 MB per skin core, adds up to approximately 233.2 million transistors and may cover an area of ​​​​approximately 199 square meters. mm. In this rank, as a next point, the crystal and folding of a dual-core processor appears to be approximately twice as large as the crystal of a dual-core single-core CPU.

Athlon 64 X2 line

The Athlon 64 X2 processor line includes several CPU models rated 4800+, 4600+, 4400+ and 4200+. At the base, kernels with the code names Toledo and Manchester can be victorious. Vіdmіnnostі mіzh them polagatі vіdmіrі cache-memory of another equal. Processors with code names Toledo, which can generate ratings of 4800+ and 4400+, generate two L2 caches (on the skin with cores) with a volume of 1 MB. CPU and Manchester codenames can use two smaller cache memory: twice 512 KB each.
The frequencies of AMD dual-core processors can reach high and equal 2.2 or 2.4 GHz. So the clock speed of AMD's older dual-core processor matches that of the older processor in the Athlon 64 line.
As far as electrical and thermal characteristics, then, as soon as possible high frequencies Athlon 64 X2, the stench is a little disturbed by the characteristics of single-core CPUs. The maximum thermal output of new processors from two cores is 110 W versus 89 W for the outstanding Athlon 64, and the power output is up to 80A versus 57.4A. However, to match the electrical characteristics of the Athlon 64 X2 with the specifications of the Athlon 64 FX-55, the increase in the maximum thermal output is less than 6W, and the boundary stream will not change. In this rank, we can say that the Athlon 64 X2 processors hang up to the motherboard converter almost as well as the Athlon 64 FX-55.

The main characteristics of the Athlon 64 X2 processor line look like an upcoming rank:


It should be noted that AMD positions Athlon 64 X2 as an independent line, which serves its purposes. The processors of this family are assigned to this group of protruding cores, for which the ability to select a large number of resource-consuming add-ons at once is important, or to stop at every robot add-on for the creation of digital content, more of these effectively feed the flow. So, Athlon 64 X2 is a deakim analogue of Athlon 64 FX, but not for gravers, but for enthusiasts who win PC for robots.


With this release, Athlon 64 X2 does not support the use of other lines: Athlon 64 FX, Athlon 64 and Sempron. Must stink continue to peacefully sleep over the market.
And besides, we should note the fact that the Athlon 64 X2 and Athlon 64 lines can have a unified rating system. This means that Athlon 64 processors with ratings higher than 4000+ will not enter the market. At the same time, the Athlon 64 FX family of single-core processors continues to develop, and some of these CPUs are requested by gamers.
The prices of Athlon 64 X2 are so, judging by them, that this line can be considered as a further development of the great Athlon 64. In fact, it's not. In addition, as the older Athlon 64 models move up to the middle price category, the top models in this line will be replaced by the Athlon 64 X2.
Appearance of Athlon 64 X2 processors for sale is worth checking out for blacks. Recommended AMD retail prices look like this:

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ - $1001;
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ - $803;
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4400+ - $581;
AMD Athlon 64 X2 4200+ - $537.

Athlon 64 X2 4800+: first acquaintance

We were able to take a look at the AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ processor, which is the top model in AMD dual-core CPU lines. Tsey processor in its own way old-fashioned look appearing even more similar to his great-grandfathers. In fact, the faults of the outstanding Athlon 64 FX and Athlon 64 for Socket 939 are more than marked.


Regardless of those that the Athlon 64 X2 is not a typical Socket 939 processor, which is responsible for most motherboards with a 939-pin processor socket, at the moment, its functioning with a lot of boards is complicated through the presence of a necessary BIOS side. A single motherboard, for which the CPU could work in dual-core mode in our laboratory, was the ASUS A8N SLI Deluxe, for which there is a special technological BIOS from the Athlon 64 X2 support. Vtіm, obviously, with the appearance of AMD dual-core processors, the sale of a small share will be eliminated to the general public.
It should be noted that without the necessary support from the side of the BIOS, Athlon 64 X2 in any motherboard works miraculously in single-core mode. So, without the updated firmware, our Athlon 64 X2 4800+ is a prototype of the Athlon 64 4000+.
The CPU-Z utility is popular, but it still doesn't show the same information about the Athlon 64 X2, although I want to know it:


Regardless of those that CPU-Z detects two cores, all information about cache memory is only available up to one of the CPU cores.
In front of the tests of the productivity of the otrimanogo processor, we were ahead of us to achieve the same thermal and electrical characteristics. For the cob, we matched the temperature of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ with the temperature of the other Socket 939 processors. For the purposes of these studies, we won a single repeat cooler AVC Z7U7414001; after warming up the processors using the S&M 1.6.0 utility, it appeared to be the same with the dual-core Athlon 64 X2.


The temperature of the Athlon 64 X2 is three times higher than the temperature of the Athlon 64 processors on the Venice core. However, regardless of the presence of the new two cores, the whole CPU is not hot for a single-core processor, it is viable according to the 130 nm technological process. Moreover, the same picture is observed even at the maximum CPU load by the robot. The temperature of the Athlon 64 X2 at 100-hundreds of wavelengths is lower than that of the Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX, which have 130 nm cores. Thus, due to the decrease in voltage and the lower temperature of the revision E core, AMD engineers really managed to achieve a pleasant thermal imaging of their dual-core processors.
As far as the power savings of Athlon 64 X2, we could not compare even more with the similar characteristics of single-core Socket 939 CPUs, and also with the power savings of older Intel processors.


As surprising as it may seem, the Athlon 64 X2 4800+'s energy efficiency is the lowest for the Athlon 64 FX-55's energy efficiency. Let me explain that the Athlon 64 FX-55 is based on an old 130 nm core, which is nothing surprising. The main bells and whistles are different: those motherboards, which are combined with Athlon 64 FX-55, and (from the point of view of the tightness of the life converter) support and new AMD dual-core processors. Tobto AMD is absolutely right, speaking about those, that all necessary infrastructure for the Athlon 64 X2 implementation is already practically ready.

Obviously, we did not miss the possibility of re-verifying the opening potential of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+. Unfortunately, the technological BIOS for ASUS A8N-SLI Deluxe, which supports Athlon 64 X2, does not allow changing the voltage on the CPU, not even a multiplier. For this experiment, overclocking was carried out on a regular voltage for the processor by increasing the frequency of the clock generator.
During the process of experiments, it was possible to increase the frequency of the clock generator to 225 MHz, while continuing to save the building to a stable function in its own processor. So, as a result of overclocking, we managed to raise the frequency of the new dual-core CPU like AMD to 2.7 GHz.


Also, when overclocking Athlon 64 X2 4800+, allowing to increase its frequency by 12.5%, which, as we know, is not so bad for a dual-core CPU. Admittedly, we can say that the frequency potential of the Toledo core is close to that of other revision E cores: San Diego, Venice and Palermo. Also, the achievement of the result during the dispersal gave us hope for the appearance of more Swiss processors in the Athlon 64 X2 family before the advancement of the technological process.

Yak mi tested

As part of this test, we compared the performance of the dual-core processor Athlon 64 X2 4800+ with the firmware code of older processors with a single-core architecture. So, the Athlon 64 X2 superseded Athlon 64, Athlon 64 FX, Pentium 4 and Pentium 4 Extreme Edition.
It's a pity that today we can't show the correlation of the new dual-core processor from AMD with competing solutions from Intel, CPU with code names Smithfield. In the next hour our test results will be updated with those of Pentium D and Pentium Extreme Edition, so stay tuned for updates.
While some systems have taken the part in testing, they have been formed from the set of components below:

Processors:

AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (Socket 939, 2.4 GHz, 2 x 1024KB L2, core revision E6 - Toledo);
AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 (Socket 939, 2.6 GHz, 1024KB L2, CG core revision - Clawhammer);
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ (Socket 939, 2.4 GHz, 1024KB L2, CG core revision - Clawhammer);
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ (Socket 939, 2.4 GHz, 512KB L2, core revision E3 - Venice);
Intel Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 3.73 GHz (LGA775, 3.73 GHz, 2MB L2);
Intel Pentium 4660 (LGA775, 3.6 GHz, 2MB L2);
Intel Pentium 4570 (LGA775, 3.8 GHz, 1MB L2);

Maternity pay:

ASUS A8N SLI Deluxe (Socket 939, NVIDIA nForce4 SLI);
NVIDIA C19 CRB Demo Board (LGA775, nForce4 SLI (Intel Edition)).

Memory:

1024MB DDR400 SDRAM (Corsair CMX512-3200XLPRO, 2 x 512MB, 2-2-2-10);
1024MB DDR2-667 SDRAM (Corsair CM2X512A-5400UL, 2 x 512MB, 4-4-4-12).

Graphic card:- PowerColor RADEON X800 XT (PCI-E x16).
Disk subsystem:- Maxtor MaXLine III 250GB (SATA150).
Operating system:- Microsoft Windows XP SP2.

Productivity

Office work

For further productivity in office programs, we scored with SYSmark 2004 and Business Winstone 2004 tests.


The Business Winstone 2004 test simulates the robotic workflow in extended programs: Microsoft Access 2002, Microsoft Excel 2002, Microsoft FrontPage 2002, Microsoft Outlook 2002, Microsoft PowerPoint 2002, Microsoft Project 2002, Microsoft Word 2002, Norton AntiVirus Professional Edition 20. All these add-ons are rich in flux, and the Athlon 64 X2 appears to be less than a trio more than its single-core counterpart Athlon 64 4000+. The small difference is explained by the more thorough memory controller of the Toledo core, but by the presence of another core.
Vtіm, in everyday life office robot Often, a sprat program runs overnight. The most efficient in which way AMD dual-core processors are shown below.


In this situation, the speed of work in Microsoft Outlook is viable Internet Explorer, at that hour, as in the background mode, copies of files are copied. Prote, as it shows, a diagram has been drawn, copying files - it’s more foldable and I’ll win the dual-core architecture here.


This test is pretty foldable. Here, in the background, archiving files for the help of Winzip, as well as in the foreground, works in Excel and Word. And in this case, we will take the whole significant dividend in the form of duality. Athlon 64 X2 4800+, which runs at 2.4 GHz, outperforms not only Athlon 64 4000+, but also single-core Athlon 64 FX-55 at 2.6 GHz.


In the world, the complexity of the task that works in the background mode, due to the dual-core architecture, begins to manifest itself more and more. In this way, the robot is modeled in the programs Microsoft Excel, Microsoft Project, Microsoft Access, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft FrontPage and WinZip, as well as anti-virus scanning in the background. In this test, the working programs seem to be zdatnymi as a next zavantazhit the core of Athlon 64 X2, the result of which does not affect the check. The dual-core processor was delivered a second time faster than a similar single-core processor.


Here the robot of a koristuvach is modeled, which takes a sheet from Outlook 2002, which can collect documents from zip-archives. While the files are being scanned for viruses with the help of VirusScan 7.0, you can scan your email and add icons to your Outlook calendar. Let's keep an eye on the corporate website and documents for the help of Internet Explorer 6.0.
This robotic model is capable of more rich threading, so the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ demonstrates more high-speed code, lower single-core processors such as AMD and Intel. Respectfully, Pentium 4 processors with "virtual" rich-threading Hyper-Threading technology cannot boast of such high productivity as Athlon 64 X2, which has two right independent processor cores.


This benchmark has a hypothetical text editor for Word 2002, as well as Dragon NaturallySpeaking 6 for converting an audio file to a text document. The finished document is converted to pdf-format with the help of Acrobat 5.0.5. Then, shriveled by the formed document, a PowerPoint 2002 presentation is created.


Here the robotic model is as follows: koristuvach vіdkrivaє data base Access 2002 i vikonuє a number of requests. Documents are archived with WinZip 8.1 help. The results of the query are exported to Excel 2002, and a diagram will be based on it. Although in some way the positive effect of dual-core is also present, processors of the Pentium 4 family can cope with such a robot more easily.
In a nutshell, we can say the following about the fact that dual-core processors in office add-ons are true. By themselves, programs of this type are rarely optimized for the creation of a rich streaming approach. Therefore, it is important to win when working in one specific appendage on a dual-core processor. However, even though the model of robots is such that some of the resource-intensive tasks are used by backgrounds, then processors with two cores can give even more significant gains in firmware.

Creation of digital content

We are speeding up with complex tests SYSmark 2004 and Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2004.


Benchmark model the robot in the following programs: Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1, Adobe Premiere 6.50, Macromedia Director MX 9.0, Macromedia Dreamweaver MX 6.1, Microsoft Windows Media Encoder 9 Version 9.00.00.2980, NewTek LightWave 3D 7.5b, Steinberg WaveLab 4.0f. Most of the programs used for creating and processing digital content support rich streaming, absolutely no wonder the success of Athlon 64 X2 4800+ in this test. Moreover, respectfully, that the strength of the dual-core CPU is shown to be the same, if the robot does not win in parallel with a few add-ons.


If the programs are running at the same time, the dual-core processors will show better results. For example, for some tests in the 3ds max 5.1 package, an image file is rendered to a bmp file, and at the same time the web-side is rendered in Dreamweaver MX. Potim koristuvach renders to vector graphic format 3D animation.


In this way, a robot is modeled in Premiere 6.5 of a shorthand, which creates a video clip from a few clips in raw format and okremy sound tracks. Checking the completion of the operation, preparing the same image in Photoshop 7.01, modifying the actual image and saving it on disk. After the completion of the creation of the video clip, the editing of yoga and adding special effects to After Effects 5.5.
I am again mimicking the gigantic advantage of the dual-core architecture in AMD both over the great Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX, and over the Pentium 4 with the technology of "virtual" rich-core Hyper-Threading.


And the axis is another one that has shown the triumph of AMD's dual-core architecture. Yogo causes the same yourself, like in the front bend. The stench is screaming at vikoristaniy models of robots. A hypothetical copywriter archives the content of a website from an archive in zip format, simultaneously extracting Flash MX for exporting an exported 3D vector graphic clip. Then we will modify it with the help of a way to enhance other pictures and optimize for more swedish animation. Podbag roller with special effects is squeezed Windows victories Media Encoder 9 for broadcasting over the Internet. Then the website that is being created is compiled in Dreamweaver MX, and in parallel the system is scanned for viruses with VirusScan 7.0.
In this way, it is necessary to know that for add-ons that work with digital content, the dual-core architecture is already visible. Practically be-yakі zavdannya of this type can effectively seize the insults of the CPU cores overnight, which will lead to a strong increase in the speed of the robotic system.

PCMark04, 3DMark 2001SE, 3DMark05

We were surprised to see the Athlon 64 X2's speed in popular synthetic benchmarks like FutureMark.






As we have already repeatedly assigned earlier, the PCMark04 test is optimized for rich streaming systems. In addition, Pentium 4 processors with Hyper-Threading technology showed better results than Athlon 64 family CPUs. Now the situation has changed. The two right cores in the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ allowed the processor to pop up on the top of the diagrams.






The graphics tests of the 3DMark family do not match the richness of the stream in any way. That's why the results of Athlon 64 X2 here are little disturbed by the performance of the outstanding Athlon 64 with a frequency of 2.4 GHz. The small advantage over the Athlon 64 4000+ is explained by the presence in the core of Toledo of a thorough memory controller, and over the Athlon 64 3800+ - by the large amount of cache memory.
Tue, at the 3DMark05 warehouse there are a couple of tests, which can work out the richness of the flow. Tse CPU test. In these benchmarks, the central processor relies on software emulation of vertex shaders, and, moreover, in another thread, the shape of the physics of the game environment is seen.






The results are completely regular. If a program can run two cores, then dual-core processors work much faster than single-core ones.

Game programs















Unfortunately, current game programs do not support rich streaming. Regardless of those that the technology of "virtual" richness of Hyper-Threading appeared a long time ago, retailers of igor do not speed up the expansion of the calculation, generated by the game engine for a stream of streams. I on the right, better for everything, not in what is important for Igor. Obviously, the increase in the number of processing capabilities of the processor for igor is not so important, but the main focus in tasks of this type lies on the video card.
In the meantime, the appearance of dual-core CPUs on the market gives hope to those who are stronger in pursuing the central processor with rozrachunkami. The result of which may be the appearance of a new generation of igor with a piece of pieced intelligence and realistic physics.

So far, there is no sense in the stasis of dual-core CPUs in gaming systems. That is why, to the point, AMD does not intend to develop its line of processors, aimed specifically at gamers, the Athlon 64 FX. Qi processors are characterized by more such frequencies and the presence of a single computational core.

Squeezed information


It's a pity that WinRAR doesn't support rich streaming, so the result of Athlon 64 X2 4800+ practically doesn't compare to the result of the great Athlon 64 4000+.


Prote є archivators, yakі can effectively capture duality. For example, 7zip. When tested in a new way, the results of the Athlon 64 X2 4800 generally confirm the performance of this processor.

Audio and video encoding


The popular mp3 codec Lame was not supported until recently. However, version 3.97 alpha 2, which has reappeared, corrected this little bit. As a result, Pentium 4 processors began to encode audio faster than Athlon 64, and Athlon 64 X2 4800+, although outperforming their single-core brothers, still looks like the older models of the Pentium 4 and Pentium 4 Extreme Edition families.


Although the Mainconcept codec can include two cores, the Athlon 64 X2's speed is not much higher than the speed of its single-core brothers. Moreover, it is often explained not only by the dual-core architecture, but also by the support of the SSE3 commands, but also by the improved memory controller. As a result, the Pentium 4 with one Mainconcept core performs better than the Athlon 64 X2 4800+.


When encoding MPEG-4 with the popular DiVX codec, the picture is different. Athlon 64 X2, the manifestations of the presence of another core, reducing the garne of improvement to a crispness, as it allows it to bypass the older Pentium 4 models.


The XviD codec also improves the richness of the threading, adding another core to the same stage gives a richly smaller increase in speed, lower in the DiVX episode.


Obviously, Windows Media Encoder codecs are best optimized for rich-kernel architectures. For example, Athlon 64 X2 4800+ copes with coding for different codecs 1.7 times faster than single-core Athlon 64 4000+, which operates at the same clock frequency. As a result, talking about whether there is a supernumber of single-core and dual-core processors in WME is simply stupid.
Like programs for processing digital content, the greater number of codecs has long been optimized for Hyper-Threading. As a result, dual-core processors, which allow counting two streams at once, count faster, lower single-core. Therefore, the majority of systems with a CPU with two cores for encoding audio and video content are completely untrue.

Editing images and videos









Popular Adobe products for video processing and image editing are well-optimized for a rich processing system and Hyper-Threading. So, in Photoshop, After Effects and Premiere, a dual-core processor like AMD demonstrates an extremely high productivity, which significantly surpasses the firmware of not only the Athlon 64 FX-55, but also seen in the factories of this class Pentium processors 4.

Text recognition


ABBYY Finereader, a popular program for optical text recognition, although it can and can be optimized for processors with Hyper-Threading technology, works on Athlon 64 X2 with only one thread. In the presence of a pardon for programmers, it is possible to detect the possibility of a parallel calculation for the name of the processor.
It's a pity, such examples of incorrect programming are being heard in our days. Let's hope that the current number of add-ons similar to ABBYY Finereader is minimal, and in the nearest possible future, the number will shrink to zero.

Mathematical calculations






Surprisingly, the popular MATLAB and Mathematica packages for the Windows XP operating system do not support threading. To that, at tsikh zavdannya Athlon 64 X2 4800+ it performs approximately one equal with Athlon 64 4000+, and outperforms even more than an optimized memory controller.


Then a lot of tasks of mathematical modeling allow you to organize a parallel calculation, as a result of inconsistencies in the increase in productivity in different dual-core CPUs. It is confirmed by the ScienceMark test.

3D rendering






The final rendering is due before the date, which can easily and effectively be parallelized. It is not surprising, therefore, that when working in 3ds max, the Athlon 64 X2 processor, equipped with two counting cores, allows you to take even more incorrigible growth in swidcode.






A similar picture is seen in Lightwave. In this way, the choice of dual-core processors in the final rendering is no less visible, lower in the add-ons for image and video processing.

Severe hostility

Before that, how to formulate the big visnovki for the pіdbags of our testing, kіlka slіv next to say about those that were lost behind the scenes. And about the comfort of vikoristanny systems equipped with dual-core processors. On the right, in a system with one single-core processor, for example, Athlon 64, at the skin moment, there can be only one calculation per hour. This means that as in the system the programs are running at once, then the scheduler of OC noises with a great frequency of switching between processor resources between tasks.

For the sake of the fact that today's processors are more than swedish, the chirping between the zavdannya sounds overwhelmed by the look of a koristuvach. It’s hard to find out and addendums, to interrupt the transfers of the processor hour to other tasks at the black one. In what direction operating system start gibberish, which often calls out to people who are sitting at the computer. So, it is often possible to predict the situation, if the program, having taken the resources of the processor, “freezes”, and such a program is even more important to take it out of the system, the chips won’t show the processor resources to the planner of the operating system.

Similar problems are blamed on systems equipped with dual-core processors, much less. On the right, in that the processors with two cores of the building plan to simultaneously count two counting flows, obviously, for the functioning of the planner, there are two more resources, which can be divided between practical additions. In fact, in order for a robot to work in a system with a dual-core processor to become uncomfortable, it is necessary to override two processes overnight, as it is necessary to waste all CPU resources in an unrestricted manner.

We have decided to conduct a small experiment that shows how the productivity of a system with a single-core and a dual-core processor is affected in parallel by a large number of resource-rich add-ons. For whom we have simulated the number of fps in Half-Life 2 by launching copies of the WinRAR archiver in the background.


As a matter of fact, with the difference in the system of the Athlon 64 X2 4800+ processor, the productivity of Half-Life 2 is on a pleasant level richer, lower in the system with a single-core, but more high-frequency Athlon 64 FX-55 processor. In fact, in a system with a single-core processor, the launch of one background program already leads to a dwarf drop in speed. With a further increase in the number of jobs that work at the background, productivity decreases to an obscene level.
In a system with a dual-core processor, save the high productivity of programs that work in the foreground, go deeper. The launch of one copy of WinRAR is practically unmarked, adding a larger number background additives, even if it is in the foreground, to bring about a lesser decrease in productivity. It should be noted that the drop in speed in this period of time is not so much a marriage of processor resources, but rather a low bandwidth capacity of the memory bus between working programs. Because background tasks will not actively work on memory, the foreground program is unlikely to be highly responsive to increased background memory.

Visnovki

Today was our first acquaintance with AMD dual-core processors. As shown by the testing, the idea of ​​using two cores in one processor demonstrated its feasibility in practice.
The choice of dual-core processors in desktop systems, significantly improves the speed of the work and a whole range of add-ons, which effectively wins out the richness of the flow. Due to the fact that virtual threading technology, Hyper-Threading has been present in Pentium 4 processors for more than three years now, software vendors have been able to promote a large number of programs that have been built to take advantage of the dual-core architecture of the CPU. So, among the additions, the speed of the work of those on dual-core processors will be increased, the next designate utilities for encoding video and audio, systems for 3D modeling and rendering, programs for editing photos and videos, as well as professional graphic programs CAD class.
At the same time, there is a large number of software security, as a rich flow is not vicorist, but vicorist is very marginalized. Among the representatives of such programs are office programs, web browsers, mail clients, media programmers, and also games. However, when working in such add-ons, the dual-core architecture of the CPU is a positive mother. For example, in vipadkah, if the sprat of the program is victorious at once.
Summarizing the above, the graph below simply shows numerically the superiority of the dual-core processor Athlon 64 X2 4800+ over the single-core Athlon 64 4000+, which operates at the same frequency of 2.4 GHz.


As you can see from the graph, Athlon 64 X2 4800+ appears in rich additions significantly better than the older CPU in the Athlon 64 family. we see the treasury. Tim is bigger, but in his own appendix he does not see his single-core brothers.
The price of the Athlon 64 X2 is worth mentioning, but at the current price processors similar to the Athlon 64 FX can have one more proposition for the safe enthusiasts. Those of them, for whom it is not the gaming productivity that matters, but the speed of work in other programs, to return the respect to the Athlon 64 X2 line. Extreme gamers will obviously need the Athlon 64 FX.

Looking at dual-core processors on our site does not end there. In the coming days, check out another part of the epic, in a movable article about dual-core CPUs from Intel.

Irrespective of those that 64-bit AMD processors were announced a long time ago, the stench hasn't conquered any part of the market in Russia, regardless of all their advances. In my opinion, these are the main reasons why.

In the first place, it was immediately stunned that Socket 754 will not live for a long time, then now to invest pennies in the platform, doomed to die? In a different way, AMD has adopted coristuvachiv, that its processors are cheaper, lower than a competitor, the A64 pro maintains an approximate parity with Intel processors, not only for productivity, but also for price. Thirdly, the overclocking potential of the first instances of AMD Athlon 64 processors turned out to be small, and in the next hour we do not check for a transition to a new step with a reduced breakdown. And if so, then why not take the A64 R4 office, what kindly breaks up, it’s more, what prices can be equaled between them? Well, I’m sure, in a quarter, regardless of the numerical lines of the announcement of the A64 processors, regardless of those that, before the announcement, the most important manufacturers had already prepared samples of motherboards for a long time, it turned out that the chipsets are far from ideal, but pay for Athlon 64 deprive the bazhati of the best.

The NVIDIA nForce 3 150 chipset did not manage to repeat the success of its predecessor, nForce2 - the best of the chipsets used for Socket A processors. Some capabilities were lower than those of the competing VIA chipset, the HyperTransport bus worked more, and the possibility of fixing frequencies on AGP and PCI buses was ignored by the virobniks. The first two shortcomings are the VIA K8T800 chipset, which provides relief, but does not help fix the AGP and PCI frequencies.

A good illustration before what has been said can be written by me in other times looking at the motherboard Gigabyte GA-K8NNXP (NVIDIA nForce3 150). I just tested the Athlon 64 processor and the motherboard under the new one, and I myself recognized the new one and told you. At the wedding, I spent a little time, having lost my dissatisfaction. The key phrase sounded like this: "... a less stable processor, only running at a frequency of 225 MHz at a voltage of 1.6 V" and the whole snag in the words "less-less". The system was tested at a frequency of 225 MHz, but could see a pardon at 220 MHz. Perhaps on the right, it was due to the fact that the frequencies on AGP/PCI were dependent, or the BIOS version showed up too early, I took the motherboard on the VIA K8T800 chipset for rechecking, and it behaved so unreasonably. Radkіsny vpadok - I tested pristry, but did not write about it.

Infection, fortunately, the situation begins to change short bik. The payment processors for Socket 939 have already appeared for sale, the number of 64-bit AMD processors is decreasing, and for Socket 754 we are offering inexpensive Sempron 3100+ processors. Judging by the first results, the processors on the "right" Newcastle core, on the front of the first "pseudo-NewCastle", which were processors on the ClawHammer core, which had half of the cache memory turned on, trochs are broken faster, and the competitor, navpaki, shifting its processor to a hot and energy-efficient Prescott core.

advertising

For the most obvious reasons, due to the fact that the popularity of 64-bit AMD processors is likely to increase in the near future, another one came up - chipset builders prepared new sets of logic for these processors. So, the NVIDIA nForce 3 150 chipset has been replaced with a new family of NVIDIA nForce 3 250 chipsets. If you are wondering about the details of the capabilities of the new chipset, I recommend taking a closer look at the Chaintech Zenith ZNF3-250 motherboard, you can see the stench. Well, to speak briefly, then the new chipset has consumed all the shortfalls of the front and looks even more pleasant.

Today, I am propagating the Gigabyte GA-K8NS motherboard, based on the NVIDIA nForce 3250 chipset and recognized for Socket 754 processors.

Gigabyte GA-K8NS
Chipset NVIDIA nForce3 250
processors Socket 754 AMD Athlon 64
Memory Type: DDR400/333/266-184pin
Large capacity up to 3GB DDR memory in 3 DIMM slots
Budovana periphery Merezhevy chip ICS 1883 LAN PHY
Realtek ALC850 audio codec
Roz'єmi introduction / conclusion 2 Serial ATA
1 FDD port
2 UDMA ATA 133/100/66 Bus Master IDE ports
2 USB 2.0/1.1 sockets (supports up to 4 ports)
Entrance/exit rose S/P DIF
2 sockets for fans
CD/AUX in
1 Game/MIDI port
Extension slots 1 AGP slot (8x/4x AGP 3.0 support)
5 PCI slots (sum of PCI 2.3)
Rear panel PS/2 Keyboard/Misha
1 LPT port
1 RJ45 port
4 USB 2.0/1.1 ports
2 COM port
Audio roses (line input, line output, microphone)
Form factor ATX (30.5 cm x 23.0 cm)
BIOS 2 Mbit flash ROM, Award BIOS

As a matter of fact, this version of the board does without additional controllers and all the advantages are based on the rich capabilities of the NVIDIA nForce3 250 chipset. Engineers experiment with breeding and, perhaps, motherly Gigabyte board GA-K8NS has some unique design features. For example, I haven't gotten any Serial-ATA roses yet, sorting them over the AGP slot.

Entry

In the rest of the hour, the market of the computer industry delighted us with the majestic variety of novelties in the world of components. It seemed that recently, our lives have seen new standards for DDR2 RAM, dual-core processors, new platforms for systems have appeared, but progress does not stand on the spot and already announced chotri-core processors, and new platforms will be expanded. This naturally captivated the market of video cards. Today, the specialists modify the models of video cards, reduce the tightness, and improve the cooling systems. However, far from all the koristuvachs of personal computers in the gut are all new items. Why work, if you want to play games today, but you don’t get a penny to buy a modern configuration of a gaming computer? After the emergence of that new platform Socket 939, the old Socket 754 went to another plane. Rich someone vvazhav її "dead-end" gіlkoy. Prote, after the announcement of the AM2 platform, Socket 939 itself opined in a similar situation. In addition, close to the fate of that, AMD company has pleased its owners of boards from Socket 754 with the release of AMD Athlon 64 processors, based on the latest revision of the Venice core to the E6 steping. So we all the same were surprised to see that the Socket 754 platform is being built today and try to understand: why is it so necessary to make happy the sellers of the "Zalіza" with a certain sum of penny signs for the purchase of a new computer, a lot of money and breathe life into what has already become familiar, instead of the system unit

Test systems

3 systems took part in the testing:

System #1

  • Motherboard ASUS K8N, socket 754, NVIDIA nForce3 250
  • Processor AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (o/c 236x10), Socket 754 (o/c 236x10)
  • Memory 2 x 512 MB Kingston PC3200
  • Video card GF 6800 GS Palit 256mb, AGP, Retail (o/c 500core/1300mem)
  • Powerman Pro (Chieftec) 460W

System #2

  • Mother MSI board K8N NEO3-FSR, socket 754, NVIDIA nForce 4-4X
  • Processor AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (o/c 236x10), Socket 754
  • Memory 2 x 512 MB SAMSUNG PC3200
  • Video card XFX GF 7600 GS eXtreme Edition (XXX) 256mb, PCI-E (o/c 500core/1300mem)
  • Living unit DELTA 350-100A 340W

System #3

  • Motherboard ASUS M2N SLI Deluxe, socket AM2, nForce570
  • Processor AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+, 2.4 GHz, Socket AM2
  • Memory 1024 MB Samsung DDR2 PC4200
  • Video card Gigabyte GF 7600GT 256MB, PCI-E
  • Powerman 430W living unit

Further, in the productivity ratio tables and comments, we will name them: System No. 1, System No. 2 and System No. 3, obviously. Rozgin the rest of the system without being carried out, the shards of it represent in our view the option of buying a new PC (to upgrade), which will give you enough productivity in today's games, and as a result, you won't need overclocking.

Before the beginning of testing, I would like to say a few words about mother boards, processors and video cards that took part in testing.

Description of motherboards

1. Motherboard ASUS K8N

Inexpensive, with rich capabilities, the Asus K8N board is based on the NVIDIA nForce3 250 chipset and supports the AMD Athlon64 and AMD Sempron processors. Obviously, “the dream of an overclocker”, it’s important to name the board, it’s worth the whole investment in it. Adjustment of the BIOS (AMI flash BIOS) can please the most difficult drivers - available changes in the frequency of the processor bus from 200 to 300 MHz in 1 MHz, (required that ASUS K8N can not fix the frequency of the PCI \ AGP bus, which is more important when running) , HyperTransport bus multiplier, the board allows you to change the voltage supplied to the processor, memory, AGP bus. In addition, ASUS K8N allows you to fine-tune the timing in memory, which is also important when overclocking the system. During the process of overclocking, the board showed a peculiarity - a stable overclocking of the processor is only possible for increasing the frequency of the AGP bus by 1-2 MHz from the default 66 MHz (vislovlyuyu vdyachnist to Maxima price information). Okremo would like to see the special features of robots and pay with video cards of the GF6xxx family. This problem is relevant for the nForce3 + GF6xxx chipset, and the images appear for a short time in other 3D add-ons (the so-called “freezes”). During the process of exploitation of this payment at the link with the PALIT GF6800GS AGP video card, for an hour we were watching for a surreal picture. Prote, swearing, the fee has robbed the most important enemy. Software security, as it comes with the motherboard, pleased with the wide variety blue programs that utility. I especially want to enable the ASUS EZ Flash function, as it allows you to update the BIOS directly through the setup menu. For the upgrade, you don't need any more utilities to run DOS, ROM firmware and floppy drives, you only need to connect your computer to the Internet.

2. Motherboard MSI K8N Neo-3F

On the purchase of this motherboard, it was possible to remove the possibility of using a video card system with a PCI-E 16x interface (the board is based on the nForce 4-4x chipset) for small pennies, tobto. without changing the configuration of the system unit. In addition, before the arrival of a new video card with a PCI-E interface, it was necessary to operate the computer for three months, and here, the MSI K8N Neo-3F became the only option for upgrading the AGP port. Forget about the complete AGP 8x support (which is far ahead of the official MSI website), which was confirmed by tests, which were carried out independently and found on the Internet. Tim is no less, the presence of this port allowed me to calmly sit with some interchanges until the appearance in our wilderness of PCI-E video cards of the middle price range for reasonable pennies.

And here there is one more problem: when overclocking the memory of the mother, the mother goes down, because of which the jumpers on the motherboard turn less and less. What can be added to the impossibility of turning on the floppy disk re-verification and not even the control scheme of the processor fan wrapper. Natomist - round trains in the kit. Zagalom, ambiguous reaction in my life has not yet been. Ale tse zovsіm does not mean that I, as a result, became dissatisfied with the purchase;

3. Motherboard ASUS M2N-SLI Deluxe

Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe motherboard is based on NVIDIA nForce 570 SLI chipset. Technical Asus specs M2N-SLI Deluxe Depending on the chipset capabilities and the number of additional controllers. Let's not guess the obvious speeches, the type of support Socket processors AM2, SLI for x8 mode and DDR2 memory. Six Serial ATA ports and one Ultra DMA 133/100/66/33 are implemented by the chipset, and additionally by a JMicron JMB363 controller, back panel. Three things are behind the new one on the rear panel of the IEEE 1394 rose, which is implemented by the Texas Instruments advanced controller. The chipset provides 10 USB 2.0 ports, some of which are routed to the rear panel, and two gigabit array controllers that work via PHY Marvell. For 8-channel sound of the High Definition Audio class, ADI 1988B is supported, neither coaxial nor optical S / PDIF. I/O functions are controlled by ITE IT8716F-S. I would like to know that the Asus M2N-SLI Deluxe board has six (sic!) fan connectors. The stench is also cut out by hand for connection: two roses are closer to the back panel, two for the beast and two in the lower right coddle.

If you talk about completeness, then it’s completely decent and includes:

  • SLI local;
  • UltraDMA 133/100/66 cable;
  • floppy train;
  • 6 SATA cables;
  • 3 cables for connection of up to 6 SATA devices;
  • bracket made of two USB 2.0 sockets;
  • bar with IEEE1394 rose;
  • kerіvnitstvo koristuvаcha ta Quick Start Guide;
  • CD with drivers and utilities;
  • set of programs InterVideo Media Launcher;
  • cover for the rear panel;
  • Microphone Array2-SNA manufactured by Andrea Electronics Corporation.

motherboard BIOS pay asus M2N-SLI Deluxe based on Award code and may not be bad overclocker capabilities. Including:

  • changing the frequency of the clock generator: 200-400 MHz with a margin of 1 MHz;
  • change the frequency of the PCI-E bus: 100-200 MHz with a margin of 1 MHz;
  • DDR2 memory voltage change: 1.8-2.5 with 0.05 V;
  • change of voltage on the processor: 0.8-1.5625 with a crock of 0.0125 V;
  • change of multiplier from crop 1.

Attach the respect to the high upper boundary of the increased voltage in memory. AT early versions The BIOS changed the multiplier with a crop of 0.5.

Krіm tsogo in rozdіlі Advanced Voltage Control є є so possibilitає schodo zmeni vrugi:

  • CPU/Chipset HT Voltage: 1.2-1.5, croc 0.05V;
  • Chipset Core Voltage: 1.4-1.6, croc 0.1V;
  • Chipset Standby Core Voltage: 1.4 or 1.6;
  • Chipset PCI-E Voltage: 1.5-1.7, croc 0.05V;
  • CPU Vcore Offset Voltage: Disabled, Offset 100mV.

As far as the timing is concerned, the list of parameters available for changing is already great and can fit only on a few arches.

Description of processors

1. AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Socket 754, Venice, ADA3000AKK4BX

As the name implies, the processor is based on the revision of the Venice core, it has 512 KB L2 cache, the operating frequency of the processor is 2 GHz, the operating voltage is 1.35V, the multiplier is 10x. Varying the faulty potential of the family of processors, we increased the BIOS FSB frequency to 240 MHz, the HyperTransport bus frequency was reduced to 3, the AMD QnQ function was turned on. The system was taken advantage of the first test, the CPU-z program indicated that the processor was running at a frequency of 2.4 GHz (240x10), the system hung for an hour after running some tests, so for stable operation, the frequency of the FSB bus was reduced to 236 MHz, and further testing was held from clock frequency 2.36 GHz (236x10).

2. AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Socket 754, Venice, ADA3000AKK4BX (OEM)

Selection of the best-guessed processor, only in OEM packaging, demonstrating similar performance before overclocking with similar performances after overclocking. Like a cooler, a boxed cooler looks like a Sempron 2600+ Soket 754 processor.

3. AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+

Processors with power cuts for Socket AM2 systems were stunned by AMD back in the middle of May. The same company released two classes of economical processors - with typical thermal imaging 65 and 35 watts. Tsі klassifіkatsіya dіє y doninі. The first group of CPUs currently includes the use of advanced dual-core processors that operate at frequencies up to 2.4 GHz inclusive and may have ratings of 3800+, 4200+ and 4600+. Taking the fate of the Athlon 64 X2 4600+ in our test, which works at a frequency of 2.4 GHz and can have a cache memory of 512 KB. The processor was not upgraded, the frequency of the processor for an hour of testing was left with the default - 2.4 GHz.

Description of video cards

Short characteristics:

  • bus interface: AGP;
  • memory interface: 256 bits;
  • memory type: 256 MB GDDR3;
  • RAMDACs: 400 MHz;
  • chip frequency: 450 MHz;
  • memory frequency: 1200 MHz.

The delivery kit includes:

  • kerіvnitstvo of a koristuvach (among those with a Russian movoy);
  • DVI-VGA adapter;
  • disk іz driver;
  • disc from CyberLink Power DVD;
  • disk іz groyu Toca Race Driver.

The next step is to indicate that the card worked on the defaults, equal to the reference frequencies. So, the core frequency in the Low power 3D mode was 350 MHz, and the Performance 3D mode was 450 MHz, and the memory frequency was 1200 MHz. A standard cooling system is installed on the card, the memory chips are covered with aluminum radiators. For the help of the good help of the RivaTuner 2.0 RC 16 program, the video card was clocked up to frequencies of 500/1300 MHz, at which it was carried out further testing.

Short characteristics:

  • bus interface: PCI-E 16x;
  • memory interface: 128 bits;
  • memory type: 256 MB GDDR2;
  • RAMDACs: 400 MHz;
  • chip frequency: 500 MHz;
  • memory frequency: 900 MHz.

The video card of the American brand XFX was selected, as usual, from China. Looks like 7600GS DDR2 is a reference design for standard passive cooling that other brands win. Rodzinka screams at the frequency of the chip and memory, and it becomes 500 MHz for the chip and 900 MHz for the memory, with which the Infenion chip vibrates with an hour of vibration of 2.3 ns. I'll guess that the frequencies of the "superior" 7600GS DDR2 become 400/800. Well, not bad for a small price difference. It is worth noting that the Vikoristan company can detect the indication of the thermistor embedded in the core, which allows especially unsafe short-term users to set their threshold for turning on the card in case of overheating directly on the driver tab without additional manipulations with the BIOS of the video card. Obviously, all diagnostic utilities can do a wonderful job of reading temperature readings. A card is supplied for small, showy, for corporate colors, boxes. The delivery set is so typical for cards of this price range:

  • manual (for our type and Russian, which is acceptable);
  • DVI-VGA adapter;
  • disk with driver and utilities.

The card showed a lot of soundness before overclocking to frequencies of 530/1000 without additional entries, for which it was tested.

Short characteristics:

  • bus interface: PCI-E 16x;
  • memory interface: 128 bits;
  • memory type: 256 MB DDR3;
  • RAMDACs: 400 MHz;
  • chip frequency: 560 MHz;
  • memory frequency: 1400 MHz.

Our looker plays the role of "bee, stars dance." It's definitely a good middling piece, which exactly repeats NVIDIA's reference design. The opening of the card was not carried out.

Test results: performance improvement

As a tool we victorious:

  • 3DMark03 (build 3.6.0) Basic Edition (Free, Limited)
  • 3DMark05 (build 1.2.0) Basic Edition (Free, Limited)
  • 3DMark06 (build 1.0.2) Basic Edition (Free, Limited)
  • DOOM3
3D Mark 2003
System characteristicsEyepieces at the test
12057
10924
13003

The most current system (No. 3) was completely cleared, in another place, behind the thinner video card, the system No. 1 was decompressed and the system No. 2 stopped working.

3D Mark 2005
System characteristicsEyepieces at the test
System #1 (A64 236x10/GF6800GS AGP 500/1300)5989
System #2 (A64 236x10/GF7600GS PCI-E 530/1000)5048
System #3 (A64 X2 4600+/GF7600GT PCI-E)5989

It's amazing, but a fact - System No. 1 veers forward, imaginatively, beyond the 6800 GS's large memory bus. 7600GT does not recognize the presence of a dual-core processor in System #3.

3D Mark 2006
System characteristicsEyepieces at the test
System #1 (A64 236x10/GF6800GS AGP 500/1300)2700
System #2 (A64 236x10/GF7600GS PCI-E 530/1000)2645
System #3 (A64 X2 4600+/GF7600GT PCI-E)3129

Bigger current system reinforces the status quo. Give respect to the minimum gap between System No. 1 and System No. 2.

We tested two video card upgrades, the results were linked to the table. Testing showed that here the “low power” of the video cards became the driving factor.

DOOM3 (1280*1024, high brightness)
System characteristicsEyepieces at the test
System #1 (A64 236x10/GF6800GS AGP 500/1300)85,0
System #2 (A64 236x10/GF7600GS PCI-E 530/1000)84,0
System #3 (A64 X2 4600+/GF7600GT PCI-E)89,7

The situation is repeated: System No. 3 is new to the leaders, but to give respect to the insignificance of the competitors. System No. 2 and No. 1 are again demonstrating a practically identical result, thereby confirming the thesis about the "processor-independence" of the system. The result of the dual-core readings is indicative of the non-optimization of new add-ons.

Visnovki

Let's bring the bags. In the course of testing, we had a thought that upgrading to a larger modern platform without changing the video card would not bring special dividends. As shown by our small study, the ability of a video card to seriously add to the test results. Dіyshovshi tsgogo vysnovka, we summarily combed the entire Internet and additionally explained that this situation is typical for other systems, including new ones. hard processor Intel Core2 Duo and changes only with different video cards of a higher class, and therefore higher varsity, such as 7900GS. Moreover, if you switch to a new platform, you plan to upgrade to CPUs and GPUs similar to the firmware code, then cardinal changes to the shorter version of the rose type and the addition of a motherboard dual channel mode robots remember nothing in the mind. So that the "old ones", practi- cally with the same functionality, that the new mothers pay for a significantly lower price, look decent, bring on the aphids of the modern systems of the middle level. Well, no matter what SATA 2 is, it's possible for someone to live.

Dyakuєmo for nadan “a pichka, like they danced” Oleksandr Kotrusova a.k.a. S.A.N.

© 2022 androidas.ru - All about Android